BackInTheBronx.com    BackInTheBronx.com Bulletin Board    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Back In THE BRONX Forums  Hop To Forums  General Interest    Culture of Death...........
Page First | Previous | Next | Last

Moderators: Rob-ADMIN
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Posted Hide Post
Laura, I can tell you from personal experience that ignorant, frightened girls jumped down flights of stairs attempting to induce a miscarriage. I personally took a girl to a hospital in the 60's who was hemorraghing from an illegal scrape (it was not my baby). Will the illegal abortion racket again raise its head? I don't know but I do know abortions will continue.

Adoptions would be great, but its hard to put yourself in the position of a pregnant, 19 year old girl in college and tell her to have that child and put it up for adoption. Even now not all the babies put up for adoption find homes and I can tell you that the foster child system has horrors. This is not an area with easy answers.

Frank, I am not suggesting selecting the lesser of two evils. That would be situational ethics and contrary to Jesuit training.
 
Posts: 336 | Location: South Side | Registered: 16 March 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Stooges Rule!"
Picture of Laura B.
Posted Hide Post
"Are you tryin' ta give me the doubletawk?"

Nucky, on the one hand, you say you are not in favor of abortions yourself, then, you say, "isn't it better than a baby going to a horrible foster home?" Convoluted logic, if you ask me.

A lot of times, abortion is done because the daughters do not want to "shame" the family. Right there proves they know it's wrong...it's a cover up to make it appear as though nothing happened.

A good friend of mine had a baby at 15, gave her up for adoption. My sister in law was RAPED became pregnant, had the baby, and gave it up to some Catholic Charities adoption agency...that takes real balls...I have always admired her, her reasoning was "well it's not the baby's fault, he/she is innocent and you can't take away an innocent life, no matter what the circumstances are". If SHE could do it, anyone can.

You cannot justify abortion, Nucky, no matter how many practical reasons you can give.


"Truth is stranger than fiction, Judgie Wudgie!!" ~ Jerome "Curly" Howard
 
Posts: 1749 | Location: Deep in the heart of Texas | Registered: 12 October 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<herb-m>
Posted
The conservative Republicans want to protect the fetus, but once they are born, they have no interest in providing health care for them.
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<karyn>
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Frank an Italian:
. A woman should decide on a method of birth control before conception, not after. There are many ways to prevent abortion..



I agree, but so should a MAN..we are not the only ones to contribute to the pregnancy, why should it be only OUR obligation to use it?

and by the way, it's pretty hard to insist on a method of birth control when you are getting raped.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: <karyn>,
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Frank an Italian
Posted Hide Post
I agree, I wasn't implying that it's totally the womans fault. Obviously the man is at fault also and should assist with the birth control choice. In the Navy they had a saying, it was KYP IYP (Keep Your Pecker, In Your Pants) that way there are no problems.


"A special breed of man will sacrifice everything for the security and freedom of so many unthankful others" --Unknown Author
"We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm." -- George Orwell

 
Posts: 1402 | Location: Topeka, KS | Registered: 25 December 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Barry B
Posted Hide Post
I have a split decision on this one. I agree with Frank that abortion should not be used as a method of birth control. But in the case of rape or incest thats another story. Another tough one is if it saves the lif of the mother.
 
Posts: 824 | Location: New Jersey | Registered: 25 March 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Stooges Rule!"
Picture of Laura B.
Posted Hide Post
I used to have a problem with rape or incest situations, but after my sis in law had that baby from a rape, I just don't know.

Years ago, some talk show had on moms with children they had from a rape. They were asked if everytime they looked at their children, did it remind them of the rape? It was a difficult show, but all the moms said they couldn't abort the child that was created from a rape, because it's not the baby's fault.

In the case of incest, wouldn't there be something horribly wrong with the baby if close family members had relations?? In that case...


"Truth is stranger than fiction, Judgie Wudgie!!" ~ Jerome "Curly" Howard
 
Posts: 1749 | Location: Deep in the heart of Texas | Registered: 12 October 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<CATHY13>
Posted
AS FAR AS INCEST, I WAS JUST READING THAT A NEW STUDY AND PERCENTAGE WISE, BABIES BORN FROM INCEST DO NOT HAVE A MUCH HIGHER RISK FOR ANY BIRTH DEFECT..NOT MANY COUNTRIES BAN INCEST MARRIAGES...EUROPE AND AFRICA DID AWAY WITH THAT LAW LONG AGO...
THE U.S AND A FEW OTHER COUNTRIES ARE THE ONLY ONES THAT STILL BAN INCEST MARRIAGE..

THE PERCENTAGE WAS SOMETHING LIKE
NON-INCEST-2 %
INCEST- 6 %
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Frank an Italian
Posted Hide Post
Yeah, well, my sister's ugly anyway.......


"A special breed of man will sacrifice everything for the security and freedom of so many unthankful others" --Unknown Author
"We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm." -- George Orwell

 
Posts: 1402 | Location: Topeka, KS | Registered: 25 December 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<MikeyD>
Posted
Herb..this is how it works...after my kids were born..I provided health care for them...I didn't look for the government to do it.
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<herb-m>
Posted
Doesn't your police health care plan include your family.
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Frank an Italian
Posted Hide Post
It probably does, Herb, the same as my Federal Government Health Care Plan. The hitch here is that we pay for those plans. My Govt plan for me and my wife alone, not including vision and dental costs 120.00 every two weeks. I'm lucky it's that cheap. We get vision and dental through my wifes company and it costs her 60.00 a month for that. No big deal, it's part of the "cost of living" I don't really mind paying for. I mind paying somebody elses.


"A special breed of man will sacrifice everything for the security and freedom of so many unthankful others" --Unknown Author
"We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm." -- George Orwell

 
Posts: 1402 | Location: Topeka, KS | Registered: 25 December 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<karyn>
Posted
quote:
Originally posted by Laura B.:
I used to have a problem with rape or incest situations, but after my sis in law had that baby from a rape, I just don't know.

Laura, I admire your sister in law. That was brave, and I wish I could say for sure that I would do the same under those circumstances. I am against abortion on demand, but I have to think about certain situations. Yes, it is certainly not the child's fault, and the child can be given up for adoption. but Laura, not every woman is as strong as your sister in law. What of the women who are gang raped, or held for days and tortured. I am not prepared to tell those woman that they must endure further trauma. Many many woman never get over these things, and to force them to bear a child when they are mentally fragile and on the edge of insanity because of a vicious rape is like raping them all over again. I know that bad things happen to good people, horrible things, life goes on, and that woman like your sister in law are to be praised for doing the right thing, but there are some things that many of us can not handle.
What of a child's rape? I find that it's usually people that don't have daughters who never think of that. Would you have an 10, 11 or 12 year old who has been raped go through a pregnancy? They are traumatized by the rape, something so horrible, so unthinkable, and now they have to have a baby? And then give the baby up? I don't know...seems really cruel to me, but I have a 12 year old who still plays with dolls, and I think of her when I think of these things, so my opinion may be biased.


In the case of incest, wouldn't there be something horribly wrong with the baby if close family members had relations?? In that case...


Well, same as above. If a young girl is raped and impregnated by her father, is she the sister/mother? What do you tell the child? Her father/grandfather was a pedophile rapist? Again, I hate the very thought of abortion. I don't believe that I could ever live with myself if I ever made that decision, but I do have compassion for women and children that have been raped. I can not judge them for that, and would not like to see that option taken away from them.
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<herb-m>
Posted
Frank I also have the Federal Government Health Plan. Yes we pay an amount, but the government pays about 60% of the cost ( I am not sure of the exact percentage). So you and I have subsidized health plans.
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of YOGI
Posted Hide Post
I'm in favor of abortion up until there is evidence that the foetus has consciousness. Since we don't know when that is presently, let's assume that it's a month before the foetus becomes viable. Say five months. Whatever a foetus is before that time, I don't believe that it is a human being. (Let's not repeat all the arguments pro and con, I've heard them all.)

This is an issue that conscientious people have to agree to accept a partial victory on or our political masters will remain the stupendously wealthy. It's an issue on which the Republicans can claim to be pro-life, thereby garnering all the votes of the folks who make it a "litmus test" of their vote.

Continued rule by the Republican servants of the stupendously wealthy will result in our pauperization as soon as the people holding our $7.8T in federal debt start using it to buy other currencies, like the Euro, or refuse to accept it in payment for oil. The only way of avoiding this eventuality is by exercising the military option of simply stealing the oil, which may be the long term intent of the neocons.

Believe me, those that will only vote for pro-life candidates, when the U.S. experiences poverty greater than the Great Depression, the low number of abortions being performed today will be an impossible goal.

The pro-life/pro-choice debate, besides the importance to those holding positions on either side, is being used by the stpendously wealthy as yet another invidious tool to stifle opposition.


CORDIALLY,

YOGI

"Do what you can, with what you have, where you are." - Theodore Roosevelt
 
Posts: 214 | Location: SF,CA | Registered: 14 March 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Stooges Rule!"
Picture of Laura B.
Posted Hide Post
AHHHH, Yogi...what is it before it's born, a duck???????

It is human from the time it's conceived, sorry buddy, that's not opinion, it's fact. Even if it can't live or breathe on it's own, it IS going to become human, but it's too small and helpless to survive on its own.

I don't buy that crap that it's not human until so many months.....uh uh.


"Truth is stranger than fiction, Judgie Wudgie!!" ~ Jerome "Curly" Howard
 
Posts: 1749 | Location: Deep in the heart of Texas | Registered: 12 October 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<herb-m>
Posted
Laura, cetainly a fetus is not human. It has the potential for becoming human after it is born. I haven't heard of any movement to call a fetus on your income tax as a dependent child.
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
<CATHY13>
Posted
CHE PICATA, MADONNA.......
 
Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
"Stooges Rule!"
Picture of Laura B.
Posted Hide Post
A fetus is not human? Of course it is, just not developed enough to live on its own. You abort it, it's murder, plain and simple.


"Truth is stranger than fiction, Judgie Wudgie!!" ~ Jerome "Curly" Howard
 
Posts: 1749 | Location: Deep in the heart of Texas | Registered: 12 October 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Frank an Italian
Posted Hide Post
This is the same argument the Pro-choice crowd has used all along. This is how they soothe their guilt. If it's not human, it's not a murder. It all hinges on that description.


"A special breed of man will sacrifice everything for the security and freedom of so many unthankful others" --Unknown Author
"We sleep safely in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm." -- George Orwell

 
Posts: 1402 | Location: Topeka, KS | Registered: 25 December 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page First | Previous | Next | Last 
 

BackInTheBronx.com    BackInTheBronx.com Bulletin Board    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Back In THE BRONX Forums  Hop To Forums  General Interest    Culture of Death...........