A Final Word on Rush - Topic Powered by Eve Community

HARPER

Posted

quote:
Originally posted by mickeymantle:
quote:
Originally posted by Inarsword:
quote:
Originally posted by HARPER:
quote:
Originally posted by norre:
quote:
Originally posted by HARPER:
A) Rush was slandered. Known liers claimed he said things he never said.

B) I still don't understand how it would hurt the teams or league if Rush promotes his team or the league on his show.

C) Becaues of the slander, the other partners dropped him, which they have a right to do. But one has to wonder if the league, or parters were to drop some outspoken liboral?

COME NOW HARPER, DO YOU REALLY NOT UNDERSTAND HOW RUSH, OR ANYONE FOR THAT MATTER, WOULD USE THEIR INFLUENCE TO FAVOR THEIR OWN PERSONAL OR FINANCIAL GAIN?

IF HE WERE TRULY SLANDERED I THINK WE WOULD HAVE HEARD MORE OUT OF RUSH. DON'T YOU?

THIS IS THE REALITY OF LIFE. JUST AS I HAVE TO LEARN TO LIVE WITH DISAPPOINTMENTS, SO DOES RUSH.THIS ISN'T ABOUT LIBERAL VS CONSERVATIVES. THIS WAS ABOUT A BUSINESS DEAL, AND HIS PARTNERS CHOSE MAKING MONEY OVER PICKING RUSH.

Norie,

If he says Ra, Ra, Ra, all day long: How would that hurt the NFL or help his team? Attendence at most games is great, and both teams recieve a cut of the revenue, so if his team has a full house both teams benefit.

Teddy,

The player are workers. They have no say so in the matter.
You know little of professional sports.

And again all this comes about this because of SLANDER!!!

You continually try to make this a free speech case, it isn't. Face it, Rush is not lilly white and that has hurt him. The NFL does not want him because he is too controversial, the same if Sharpton or any one of his ilk tried to buy a franchise. Give it up.

You know little of professional sports.

You have no knowledge of what I know about. I would venture to say that I know at LEAST as much as you. Owners MUST be sensitive to the opinions of their players. The last thing they want is poor player-owner relations and low morale that can result in issues that may impact on team play. The players don't want Rush, and that tells me alot. Let's discuss the issues, not what you think I know about, OK?

First off don't get so angry that your depend's overflows. Next, is it all the players or just a few who are stured up by their union president, sharpie, & jerkson.

Recession is when my neighbor loses his job, Depression is when I lose my job.

Recovery is when Milhouse loses his job.

Posts: 2886 | Location: 4 Corners | Registered: 26 October 2008

Ignored post by HARPER posted

Posted

quote:
Originally posted by HARPER:
quote:
Originally posted by mickeymantle:
quote:
Originally posted by Inarsword:
quote:
Originally posted by HARPER:
quote:
Originally posted by norre:
quote:
Originally posted by HARPER:
A) Rush was slandered. Known liers claimed he said things he never said.

B) I still don't understand how it would hurt the teams or league if Rush promotes his team or the league on his show.

C) Becaues of the slander, the other partners dropped him, which they have a right to do. But one has to wonder if the league, or parters were to drop some outspoken liboral?

COME NOW HARPER, DO YOU REALLY NOT UNDERSTAND HOW RUSH, OR ANYONE FOR THAT MATTER, WOULD USE THEIR INFLUENCE TO FAVOR THEIR OWN PERSONAL OR FINANCIAL GAIN?

IF HE WERE TRULY SLANDERED I THINK WE WOULD HAVE HEARD MORE OUT OF RUSH. DON'T YOU?

THIS IS THE REALITY OF LIFE. JUST AS I HAVE TO LEARN TO LIVE WITH DISAPPOINTMENTS, SO DOES RUSH.THIS ISN'T ABOUT LIBERAL VS CONSERVATIVES. THIS WAS ABOUT A BUSINESS DEAL, AND HIS PARTNERS CHOSE MAKING MONEY OVER PICKING RUSH.

Norie,

If he says Ra, Ra, Ra, all day long: How would that hurt the NFL or help his team? Attendence at most games is great, and both teams recieve a cut of the revenue, so if his team has a full house both teams benefit.

Teddy,

The player are workers. They have no say so in the matter.
You know little of professional sports.

And again all this comes about this because of SLANDER!!!

You continually try to make this a free speech case, it isn't. Face it, Rush is not lilly white and that has hurt him. The NFL does not want him because he is too controversial, the same if Sharpton or any one of his ilk tried to buy a franchise. Give it up.

You know little of professional sports.

You have no knowledge of what I know about. I would venture to say that I know at LEAST as much as you. Owners MUST be sensitive to the opinions of their players. The last thing they want is poor player-owner relations and low morale that can result in issues that may impact on team play. The players don't want Rush, and that tells me alot. Let's discuss the issues, not what you think I know about, OK?

First off don't get so angry that your depend's overflows. Next, is it all the players or just a few who are stured up by their union president, sharpie, & jerkson.

You need to realize that many of the NFL players are college graduates, some are even intelligent. They can read and understand what Rush says and his slant on society and politics. You have this strange view that they all take orders or are influenced by Sharpton et al. I would think that your viewpoint is a bit paranoid. Come out of your cave and smell the fresh air.

EGO SUM LUX MUNDI

Posts: 1927 | Location: Oslo, Norway | Registered: 15 February 2009

Ignored post by Inarsword posted

Hummingbird

Posted

quote:
You have this strange view that they all take orders or are influenced by Sharpton et al.

SO? THEN HOW CAN RUSH INFLUENCE ANYONE? YOU COME OUT OF YOUR CAVE, PHEEWEY YOU'RE MOLDY ALREADY.

Hummingbird

Posts: 839 | Location: long island new york | Registered: 10 September 2009

Ignored post by Hummingbird posted

Posted

quote:
Originally posted by Hummingbird:
quote:
You have this strange view that they all take orders or are influenced by Sharpton et al.

SO? THEN HOW CAN RUSH INFLUENCE ANYONE? YOU COME OUT OF YOUR CAVE, PHEEWEY YOU'RE MOLDY ALREADY.

You forgot, I said that some were intelligent and wouldn't be influenced. Most intelligent people have minds of their own and are not easily led. Unfortunately, some become phrase repeating sycophants and allow others to dictate what they should think. Before you say that I am brainwashed, please allow me to state that I occasionally listen to Hannity and O'Reilly to see what they are saying. Yes I also read the NY Times, Post and Daily News as well as the Drudge Report and others. Why? So that I can understand what both sides are saying and be aware of the panic that certain people would like to cause.

EGO SUM LUX MUNDI

Posts: 1927 | Location: Oslo, Norway | Registered: 15 February 2009

Ignored post by Inarsword posted

Bronx1SG

Posted

I applaud this type of open-mindedness which many people, including the ones that we would categorize as intelligent, lack. We have to remember that there are forces and agendas behind every political decision as well as behind every attempt to counter such agendas. Today's headlines reads"

Obama Reverses Travel Ban
20-Year-Old Law Kept Thousands
Out of America: Travel Ban Will End

This will allow millions of HIV+ foreigners to flood the already overcrowded healthcare system in the US. Whose agenda and interests does that support, yours, mine? No, it supports an international agenda that believes you should take from the "rich" and give to the poor. If you live in someplace, for instance, Bangladesh, making $50,000/yr makes you, in their eyes, superrich. Here, you can barely scrape by but the elitists want us to share what we scrimped and saved all these years with those that never worked a day in their lives. The battle isn't about Rush, it's about America and our way of life.

P.S. My family and I came to the US when I was nine, legally.

Posts: 23 | Location: Walnut Creek, CA | Registered: 06 July 2007

Ignored post by Bronx1SG posted

Posted

quote:
Originally posted by Bronx1SG:
I applaud this type of open-mindedness which many people, including the ones that we would categorize as intelligent, lack. We have to remember that there are forces and agendas behind every political decision as well as behind every attempt to counter such agendas. Today's headlines reads"

Obama Reverses Travel Ban
20-Year-Old Law Kept Thousands
Out of America: Travel Ban Will End

This will allow millions of HIV+ foreigners to flood the already overcrowded healthcare system in the US. Whose agenda and interests does that support, yours, mine? No, it supports an international agenda that believes you should take from the "rich" and give to the poor. If you live in someplace, for instance, Bangladesh, making $50,000/yr makes you, in their eyes, superrich. Here, you can barely scrape by but the elitists want us to share what we scrimped and saved all these years with those that never worked a day in their lives. The battle isn't about Rush, it's about America and our way of life.

P.S. My family and I came to the US when I was nine, legally.

A TRAVEL ban on people infected with HIV travelling to the United States will be overturned early next year.

The order will be completed tomorrow, US President Barack Obama said, finishing a process begun during the Bush administration.

EGO SUM LUX MUNDI

Posts: 1927 | Location: Oslo, Norway | Registered: 15 February 2009

Ignored post by Inarsword posted

Hummingbird

Posted

quote:
A TRAVEL ban on people infected with HIV travelling to the United States will be overturned early next year.

The order will be completed tomorrow, US President Barack Obama said, finishing a process begun during the Bush administration.

REALLY INASWARD? WHERE DID YOU GET THIS LITTLE TIDBIT. THIS PRES IS BENT ON DESTROYING THIS COUNTRY AND THIS IS JUST A LITTLE MORE OF IT ~ WHY DO WE NEED THESE PEOPLE? AND IS HIS NEW HEALTH CARE BILL GOING TO COVER THE COST OF THESE PEOPLE HERE? SOMEONE GIVE ME ONE GOOD REASON FOR THIS TO BE HAPPENING, WHY COULDN'T HE JUST LEAVE IT ALONE AND THINK ABOUT THE TROOPS IN AFGHANISTAN?

Hummingbird

Posts: 839 | Location: long island new york | Registered: 10 September 2009

Ignored post by Hummingbird posted

mickeymantle

Posted

Perhaps you missed this part of the sentence;

.......finishing a process begun during the Bush administration.

______________________________________________________________
Where love rules, there is no will to power, and where power predominates, love is lacking. The one is the shadow of the other.

Posts: 3712 | Location: a beautiful farm in a MORE beautiful valley. | Registered: 27 October 2008

Ignored post by mickeymantle posted

Posted

quote:
Originally posted by Hummingbird:
quote:
A TRAVEL ban on people infected with HIV travelling to the United States will be overturned early next year.

The order will be completed tomorrow, US President Barack Obama said, finishing a process begun during the Bush administration.

REALLY INASWARD? WHERE DID YOU GET THIS LITTLE TIDBIT. THIS PRES IS BENT ON DESTROYING THIS COUNTRY AND THIS IS JUST A LITTLE MORE OF IT ~ WHY DO WE NEED THESE PEOPLE? AND IS HIS NEW HEALTH CARE BILL GOING TO COVER THE COST OF THESE PEOPLE HERE? SOMEONE GIVE ME ONE GOOD REASON FOR THIS TO BE HAPPENING, WHY COULDN'T HE JUST LEAVE IT ALONE AND THINK ABOUT THE TROOPS IN AFGHANISTAN?

The Sydney Morning Herald where the headlines came from. Why don't you read the article?

EGO SUM LUX MUNDI

Posts: 1927 | Location: Oslo, Norway | Registered: 15 February 2009

Ignored post by Inarsword posted

Hummingbird

Posted

quote:
Why don't you read the article?

I did read the article, but there was nothing in it about what you reported. So?

Hummingbird

Posts: 839 | Location: long island new york | Registered: 10 September 2009

Ignored post by Hummingbird posted

mickeymantle

Posted

Are you aware that President Obama is just following through on the process initiated by President Bush?

Why do you then state that President Obama is "bent on destroying this country"?...he is merely following through with Bush's initiative.

______________________________________________________________
Where love rules, there is no will to power, and where power predominates, love is lacking. The one is the shadow of the other.

Posts: 3712 | Location: a beautiful farm in a MORE beautiful valley. | Registered: 27 October 2008

Ignored post by mickeymantle posted

Posted

quote:
Originally posted by Hummingbird:
quote:
Why don't you read the article?

I did read the article, but there was nothing in it about what you reported. So?

Here you go Birdie, let me know if I should print the whole article since you have problems finding it.

www.smh.com.au/world/obama-vow...v-20091031-hqwr.html

EGO SUM LUX MUNDI

Posts: 1927 | Location: Oslo, Norway | Registered: 15 February 2009

Ignored post by Inarsword posted

jigsaw

Posted

quote:
Originally posted by Hummingbird:
quote:
Why don't you read the article?

I did read the article, but there was nothing in it about what you reported. So?

Gracie, Gracie, Gracie. What are we going to do with you? What planet are you on? LOL

Posts: 124 | Location: usa | Registered: 29 March 2009

Ignored post by jigsaw posted

norre

Posted

quote:
Originally posted by Inarsword:
quote:
Originally posted by Hummingbird:
quote:
Why don't you read the article?

I did read the article, but there was nothing in it about what you reported. So?

Here you go Birdie, let me know if I should print the whole article since you have problems finding it.

www.smh.com.au/world/obama-vow...v-20091031-hqwr.html

IS IT IN BIG PRINT SO SHE COULD SEE IT? HAHAHA

------------------------------
IF YOU CAN'T BE CONTENT IN WHAT YOU HAVE, BE THANKFUL FOR WHAT YOU HAVE ESCAPED.

Posts: 508 | Registered: 20 September 2009

Ignored post by norre posted

Posted

Perhaps we could get someone to read it to her.

EGO SUM LUX MUNDI

Posts: 1927 | Location: Oslo, Norway | Registered: 15 February 2009

Ignored post by Inarsword posted

Bronx1SG

Posted

Regardless of which administration started us into this miasma, the bottom line is we are changing policies and laws that bring no benefit to the average American. Bad enough we are the "police force of the world" and the disastor relief organization to the world, now we will be the level 1 center of healthcare for the world. In the meantime you try to get yourself or your child a Swine Flu shot or as a veteran try to get something treated beyond the common cold in VA hospital. As we used to say in the Bronx, fugeddaboutit.

Posts: 23 | Location: Walnut Creek, CA | Registered: 06 July 2007

Ignored post by Bronx1SG posted

norre

Posted

GOOD POINTS 1STSG. BUT WHEN DID THEY EVER DO ANYTHING THAT BENEFITS THE AVERAGE AMERICAN?

I'M STILL WAITING FOR THE SWINE FLU VACCINE TO MAKE AN APPEARENCE UP HERE.

------------------------------
IF YOU CAN'T BE CONTENT IN WHAT YOU HAVE, BE THANKFUL FOR WHAT YOU HAVE ESCAPED.

Posts: 508 | Registered: 20 September 2009

Ignored post by norre posted

miket

Posted

When it gets there Norre, unless you are pregnant,very young, very old, you will have to wait in line.
Wonder if the season will pass like the normal flu before vaccine is available to everyone.
I would love to see the drug companies get stiffed after all this.

Posts: 1225 | Location: Universal City, TX. | Registered: 19 December 2008

Ignored post by miket posted

norre

Posted

I AM A NURSE MIKE, GOT THEM ALL BEAT. LMAO

DOES ANYONE WONDER, LIKE I DO, WHY EVERYONE IS SICK? THERE IS A LOT OF REGULAR FLU GOING AROUND AND I NEVER REMEMBERED IT BEING THIS EARLY OR VIRULENT. BOY, IT MAKES YOU WONDER DOESN'T IT.

IS IT THE SAME WHERE YOU LIVE?

------------------------------
IF YOU CAN'T BE CONTENT IN WHAT YOU HAVE, BE THANKFUL FOR WHAT YOU HAVE ESCAPED.

Posts: 508 | Registered: 20 September 2009

Ignored post by norre posted